<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The perception of the prospect</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dailysense.com/2009/03/10/the-perception-of-the-prospect/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dailysense.com/2009/03/10/the-perception-of-the-prospect/</link>
	<description>Daily drips of not so common sense on marketing, brands and social media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 01:23:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: M to tha Hizzo</title>
		<link>http://dailysense.com/2009/03/10/the-perception-of-the-prospect/comment-page-1/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>M to tha Hizzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 20:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailysense.com/?p=186#comment-40</guid>
		<description>Love the Picture!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love the Picture!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ClayHebert</title>
		<link>http://dailysense.com/2009/03/10/the-perception-of-the-prospect/comment-page-1/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>ClayHebert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 16:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailysense.com/?p=186#comment-36</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment, Chuck.  Great insight.  The commonality in the juxtaposition is this...seller intent drives customer perception, they are not mutually exclusive.  Let&#039;s take the sleazy used car salesman example.  His intent is to make a sale and a commission.  My perception is a reality, then.  If I think he&#039;s sleazy, he is.  Even if he uses the perfect &#039;words&#039; during our transaction, I likely won&#039;t buy a car from him.  The alternative is the quality car salesman whose intent is to make sure that I&#039;m and have a wonderful customer experience, whether he makes a sale or not.  If it is apparent to me that the intent is pure, he could be less than perfect with his words and I&#039;ll likely give him the benefit of the doubt, if not the sale.  Seth Godin talks about this in our Alternative MBA class and sales guru Mahan Khalsa says, &quot;your intent is more important than your technique&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment, Chuck.  Great insight.  The commonality in the juxtaposition is this&#8230;seller intent drives customer perception, they are not mutually exclusive.  Let&#8217;s take the sleazy used car salesman example.  His intent is to make a sale and a commission.  My perception is a reality, then.  If I think he&#8217;s sleazy, he is.  Even if he uses the perfect &#8216;words&#8217; during our transaction, I likely won&#8217;t buy a car from him.  The alternative is the quality car salesman whose intent is to make sure that I&#8217;m and have a wonderful customer experience, whether he makes a sale or not.  If it is apparent to me that the intent is pure, he could be less than perfect with his words and I&#8217;ll likely give him the benefit of the doubt, if not the sale.  Seth Godin talks about this in our Alternative MBA class and sales guru Mahan Khalsa says, &#8220;your intent is more important than your technique&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck</title>
		<link>http://dailysense.com/2009/03/10/the-perception-of-the-prospect/comment-page-1/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 16:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailysense.com/?p=186#comment-35</guid>
		<description>I think you have two good points in this short post that apparently contradict one another.

One the one hand, perception is reality, intent doesn&#039;t matter. But at the end, you say the opposite.

Both ring with truth on their own, though. What&#039;s the commonality in the juxtaposition?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you have two good points in this short post that apparently contradict one another.</p>
<p>One the one hand, perception is reality, intent doesn&#8217;t matter. But at the end, you say the opposite.</p>
<p>Both ring with truth on their own, though. What&#8217;s the commonality in the juxtaposition?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
