<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Director of Phone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dailysense.com/2010/01/10/director-of-phone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dailysense.com/2010/01/10/director-of-phone/</link>
	<description>Daily drips of not so common sense on marketing, brands and social media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 16:23:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: @SteffanAntonas</title>
		<link>http://dailysense.com/2010/01/10/director-of-phone/comment-page-1/#comment-596</link>
		<dc:creator>@SteffanAntonas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 17:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailysense.com/?p=1990#comment-596</guid>
		<description>hahaha. Nailed it. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hahaha. Nailed it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clayhebert</title>
		<link>http://dailysense.com/2010/01/10/director-of-phone/comment-page-1/#comment-594</link>
		<dc:creator>clayhebert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 07:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailysense.com/?p=1990#comment-594</guid>
		<description>I agree with pretty much everything you said, Paul.   
 
I just think that the organizations that do it best (like we&#039;re seeing with Zappos, Best Buy, Dell and others) won&#039;t relegate social media to a specific department like Marketing or PR.  It will go beyond that and be integrated into the fabric of the company. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with pretty much everything you said, Paul.   </p>
<p>I just think that the organizations that do it best (like we&#039;re seeing with Zappos, Best Buy, Dell and others) won&#039;t relegate social media to a specific department like Marketing or PR.  It will go beyond that and be integrated into the fabric of the company.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clayhebert</title>
		<link>http://dailysense.com/2010/01/10/director-of-phone/comment-page-1/#comment-593</link>
		<dc:creator>clayhebert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 07:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailysense.com/?p=1990#comment-593</guid>
		<description>Exactly.  You nailed it, John. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly.  You nailed it, John.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Ting</title>
		<link>http://dailysense.com/2010/01/10/director-of-phone/comment-page-1/#comment-592</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Ting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 07:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailysense.com/?p=1990#comment-592</guid>
		<description>Hmm I disagree on the last bit. 
 
Communication is a massive skillset and a massive &#039;department&#039; to successful business. 
 
I think what &#039;social media&#039; has done for the first time in a long time is introduce the value of a one on one conversation to a business from mass communication. It&#039;s also changed the value of an interaction with a suspect, prospect, customer and/or evangelist from being a single transaction to a measurable and manageable relationship. 
 
I think it&#039;s more likely to change the traditional Public Relations role as they have to learn to speak with people, not to them. 
 
Paul </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm I disagree on the last bit. </p>
<p>Communication is a massive skillset and a massive &#039;department&#039; to successful business. </p>
<p>I think what &#039;social media&#039; has done for the first time in a long time is introduce the value of a one on one conversation to a business from mass communication. It&#039;s also changed the value of an interaction with a suspect, prospect, customer and/or evangelist from being a single transaction to a measurable and manageable relationship. </p>
<p>I think it&#039;s more likely to change the traditional Public Relations role as they have to learn to speak with people, not to them. </p>
<p>Paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://dailysense.com/2010/01/10/director-of-phone/comment-page-1/#comment-591</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 06:57:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailysense.com/?p=1990#comment-591</guid>
		<description>So true Clay.  It is just plain communication. Hiring individuals with these skills to fill departments and leadership roles will be critical. I can still see the role of a communications department for media creation and outreach but the most powerful brands are the ones like Zappos that are engaging customer on all levels and in every department.  Jim Thomason of Thomas Nelson posted on this as well. &lt;a href=&quot;http://thebusinessofpeople.blogspot.com/2009/11/skip-social-media-staff.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://thebusinessofpeople.blogspot.com/2009/11/s...&lt;/a&gt; 
John </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So true Clay.  It is just plain communication. Hiring individuals with these skills to fill departments and leadership roles will be critical. I can still see the role of a communications department for media creation and outreach but the most powerful brands are the ones like Zappos that are engaging customer on all levels and in every department.  Jim Thomason of Thomas Nelson posted on this as well. <a href="http://thebusinessofpeople.blogspot.com/2009/11/skip-social-media-staff.html" target="_blank"></a><a href="http://thebusinessofpeople.blogspot.com/2009/11/s.." rel="nofollow">http://thebusinessofpeople.blogspot.com/2009/11/s..</a>.<br />
John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
